Research suggests that
the oceans’ phytoplankton are declining in abundance in many
places.
|
Global Biosphere September 1997 - August 1998 composite image showing the magnitude and distribution of global oceanic chlorophyll a and terrestrial primary production. |
But first of all, what
are phytoplankton, and secondly, why should we be interested in
what’s happening to them?
Phytoplankton are
microalgae that float, drifting in the seas’ sunlit surface.
Although these microalgae are too small individually to be seen by
your naked eye, collectively they are so numerous that they are the
ocean’s main primary producers. Just like plants on land, the
phytoplankton uses the energy in sunlight to combine carbon dioxide
and water to produce sugar and oxygen in the process we call
photosynthesis. To give you an idea of the significance of
phytoplankton, it is interesting to compare them to the macroalgae –
the seaweeds, with which most people will be more familiar.
Collectively, the macroalgae, although much bigger, account for less
than 5% of the total primary production in the sea each year. As primary producers the phytoplankton underpin the marine food chain and determine the
abundance of other marine life, from the amount of fish in the sea to
the number of polar bears on the Arctic ice (see: The importance of plankton).
The phytoplankton do
more than underpin the marine food chain however, as they also play a
central role in the global carbon cycle by influencing the
atmospheric composition of the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide. Over
hundreds of millions of years the burial of some of the organic
carbon fixed by phytoplankton photosynthesis sequestered carbon in
the sediments; some of this became the Earth’s oil and gas
reserves. Likewise, over similar time-scales, the burial of inorganic
carbon in the calcium carbonate remains of phytoplankton
coccolithophores sequestered carbon in deposits we now know as chalk.
It is changes in the rates of phytoplankton growth and carbon
fixation that are thought to have played an important role as
feedback mechanisms driving climate change during glacial /
interglacial periods. For example, as global temperatures cooled as
the Earth entered a glacial period, it is suggested that steeper
temperature gradients would have developed between the poles and the
equator strengthening winds, which are thought to have then blown
nutrients from the land to the sea. This increase in nutrients could
have acted as a fertiliser promoting phytoplankton growth leading to
a greater drawdown of carbon dioxide and a further cooling of the
atmosphere.
So, as you can see, the
phytoplankton play an important role on Earth despite their
diminutive size, which is why a paper published by 3 Canadian
Scientists in Nature in 2010
(http://bit.ly/1OwkMze
and http://bit.ly/1Q4HseL)
caused quite a stir. The authors of the Nature paper led by Daniel
Boyce used a 100-year data set to see if phytoplankton had changed in
their abundance in the sea. Their results suggested that the
phytoplankton had reduced in abundance globally by 40% since 1950, or
a decline of about 1% per year. They suggested that warming seas due
to climate change might have led to increased stratification
(layering) reducing the supply of nutrients to the surface from
deeper waters; in essence, the supply of fertiliser to the surface
promoting phytoplankton growth had reduced. The Canadian scientists
study was controversial however. Other scientists thought they saw
different results and the study was also criticised on the fact that
it combined data on phytoplankton collected in very different ways.
The earlier part of the data set used Secchi Depths as a measure of
phytoplankton (more about Secchi Depths in a later blog) and the
later part used measurements of chlorophyll abundance.
Fast forward to the
last three months of 2015 and three new studies on phytoplankton
abundance were published in quick succession. The first of these by
Cecile Rousseau and Watson Gregg looked at satellite ocean colour and
environmental data, and reported that diatoms had declined by more
than 1 percent per year from 1998 to 2012 globally (the 15-year
period the scientists studied) leading to changes in both
phytoplankton abundance and community composition. Losses of diatoms
were most significant in the North Pacific, the North Indian, and the
Equatorial Indian oceans (http://bit.ly/1Rhd5kg
and http://bit.ly/1W5oJOv).
The scientists’ study suggested that a likely cause was a
shallowing of the mixed-layer by 1.8 meters (5.9 feet). The
mixed-layer is the uppermost layer of ocean water and a shallowing
would reduce the nutrients available for phytoplankton growth. Why
the mixed layer shallowed is still uncertain. One possibility the
scientists suggested is a change in wind.
|
A collection of diatoms ©Richard Kirby. About 50% of the primary production on Earth takes place in the oceans and diatoms are the most important photosynthetic eukaryotes accounting for about 40% of total marine primary production. |
However, the second
study, also published in October 2015, and led by Michael Behrenfeld
(http://bit.ly/1Pgwj74)
suggested that there is an inherent error in the algorithm we use to
convert satellite measures of ocean colour (an estimation of
chlorophyll abundance) into phytoplankton biomass. Phytoplankton can
alter the amount of chlorophyll in their cells depending upon light
intensity and nutrients. As a result, the scientists suggested that
contemporary relationships between chlorophyll changes derived from
satellite measures of ocean colour, are not indicative of
proportional changes in productivity; light-driven decreases in
chlorophyll can be associated with constant or even increased
photosynthesis. In other words, failing to take account of this
feature introduces a source of error causing temporal anomalies in
surface chlorophyll to over-represent associated changes in
mixed-layer productivity.
The third study
published in November 2015 by lead author Sara Rivero-Calle
(http://bit.ly/1PJEzOs
and
http://bit.ly/1LFI9T5)
looked at the abundance of coccolithophores in the North Atlantic
over the last 45 years. Coccolithophores are the phytoplankton that
surround their cells with plates of calcium carbonate. These authors
found that the relative abundance of coccolithophores had increased
10 times, or by an order of magnitude, during this 45-year period.
During the same period the authors found that the relative abundance
of other species such as diatoms, had declined in some places. To
explain the increase in coccolithophores the authors suggested that
they may be taking advantage of the extra carbon from carbon dioxide
dissolved in seawater as a result of rising levels of atmospheric
carbon dioxide. Interestingly, in the geological record,
coccolithophores have been typically more abundant during Earth’s
warm interglacial and high CO2 periods.
Now, at the beginning
of 2016, a new paper titled “A reduction in marine primary
productivity driven by rapid warming over the tropical Indian Ocean”
has just been published in the Journal Geophysical Research
Letters - http://bit.ly/1PvYhcQ.
In the paper led by author Matthew Koll Roxy from the Centre for
Climate Change Research at the Indian Institute of Tropical
Meteorology, data is presented demonstrating a decline in phytoplankton
in the western Indian Ocean by up to 20% over the last 60 years. The
western Indian Ocean shows the largest warming trend among the
tropical oceans and the study’s authors found the downward trend in
phytoplankton could be explained by a reduction in nutrients reaching
the surface form deeper waters due to increased stratification of the
water column.
So what’s happening
to the ocean’s phytoplankton at a global scale? I’d say there is both mounting evidence that phytoplankton populations are changing
globally and that we need to understand how we study them, and as a
result we urgently need much more research. As I explained above,
these tiny organisms are central to the marine food chain and the
global carbon cycle and consequently, I’d argue, it is imperative
to understand what is happening to help us appreciate the
ramifications of climate change, not just in the oceans but also for
our planet.
Dr Richard Kirby is a British plankton expert, scientist, author and speaker. Follow Richard @planktonpundit on Twitter. Richard’s book “Ocean Drifters, a secret world beneath the waves” is available on Amazon and as an iBook www.planktonpundit.org.